In a nutshell, because it excels at learning—more precisely, machine learning, the term for AI’s unprogrammed ability to learn from its own experiences. It improves with repeated usage.
Speech recognition is an example of machine learning since it improves with practice. The AI may have trouble recognizing a word for the first time, but if it hears the term often enough, it will be able to learn it from the data without any further programming on the part of the human. Artificial intelligence has figured out how to raise its level of artistic competence in the same way human artists have.
As AI improves, it stands to reason that its widespread use will follow. Therefore, progress is increasing swiftly. This is why AI can produce such lifelike images, as this corgi at a sushi bar.
Which way do you see this going, good or bad?
The art is good because it makes accurate pictures of the scenes you choose. There are ethical concerns. The issues concern both the types of users and the ways in which they interact with artificial intelligence.
One way in which AI development contributes to the spread of disinformation is by making fakes harder to identify with the naked eye. This is due to the fact that deep fakes are made in part by repeatedly feeding fake pictures into AI systems, which causes them to become very lifelike.
Additionally, human operators introduce their own biases into the AI system. OpenAI has said that “the dataset may be skewed toward presenting women in more sexualized scenarios” because to the disproportionate number of male users of AI.
Another concern is that it might lead to the loss of employment for certain artists and designers working in the field of visual communication. For instance, nowadays you can buy AI-generated pictures from Shutterstock. It’s impolite to just replace people with code, even if they do promise to pay artists whose work is used to train AI.
Artificial intelligence picture generators will most likely have the greatest impact by greatly increasing the number of individuals who can create and experiment with art and illustration. Optimistically, you would argue this is revolutionary in communication because the popularity of Craiyon memes demonstrates that even persons who don’t consider themselves artists may benefit from access to such tools. That might alter our interactions.